1800: (Default)
1800 ([personal profile] 1800) wrote in [community profile] bakerstreetmods2020-03-18 07:11 pm

BAKERSTREET: PROBLEMS/CONCERNS

Please let us know if there are any issues of spam, harassment, or general asshattery going on at [community profile] bakerstreet.

Provide evidence if you're speaking against another player. This is not a venue for anonymous bashing just for the fun of it. Such comments will be deleted.


Anon is on, IP logging is on, and comments can be screened at request.

(Anonymous) 2020-05-06 05:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Hi Mods,

There is a 10/11 year old character in the Kink Meme here:

https://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/6393754.html?thread=2807059610#cmt2807059610

I thought you should be made aware.

(Anonymous) 2020-05-07 05:51 am (UTC)(link)
a little too late for it to be worth anything, but i would think a kink meme is kind of a place to play out that sort of thing. i'm not into underage in any context at all, but a kink meme or looking for kinks is sort of... the appropriate place to look for it? rpa allows for underage requests in the kinks you want to play threads, so i don't understand why there's suddenly policing about ages for fake characters in a public comm. it's not breaking tos, it's not breaking the rules of the comm. this feels like someone's deciding this particular kink bothers them so they're trying to ban it.

that's a slippery slope argument. if it's in an apropos meme, then it should be allowed. i don't like the kink, but i also don't like gore or vore, but people play that and no one cares. they're not playing it openly in a gen meme where people don't expect it. you expect random kinks, even offensive to certain parties ones in a kink meme.

i know you're trying to make everyone happy, but bs is supposed to be a neutral zone, of sorts. unless they're breaking rules, there's no reason to police them. some people need to learn to scroll on.